banner
SOX Backlash…New Rules...New Leverage…

Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) Information, SOX 404, Accelerated Filers

SOX Talk

"Over the last two years, provisions of the Act has required greater effort and resulted in higher costs than expected."
PCAOB

"...need of further clarification to reduce unnecessary costs and burdens while at the same time not jeopardizing the benefits of Section 404." SEC

"...to swing the Sarbanes Oxley regulatory pendulum back from the process oriented, control-centric, “kitchen sink” approach to one that allowed companies to make intelligent choices around properly mitigating their financial reporting risks via a top-down risk assessment." - SOX404.info

Sarbanes Oxley (SOX) Information, SOX 404, Accelerated Filers

Addressing Fluidity in the SOX Environment

The Backlash

Ever since the first year of required compliance in 2004, Sarbanes-Oxley and Section 404 in particular has been criticized for the excessive cost and disruption it created for companies. The public debate about whether it's been worth the effort has at times reached a fever pitch. As recently noted by the former Chairman of the SEC, Harvey Pitt1, "As costs mounted, and auditors became defensive in their audits of internal control, a crescendo of criticism and despair arose, ultimately persuading the PCAOB and the SEC to revisit their prior guidance to make the beneficial purposes of the SOX 404 more obtainable, with lower costs and more focused efforts".

In this regard, certain statements from both the SEC and PCAOB December releases especially stand out2. At the same time, greater use of a risk based approach seems to reflect a return to the original principles of SOX and certainly of the COSO Framework.


1Compliance Week, March 2007 issue
2SEC Release # 33-8762, 34-54976 (12/15/06) and PCAOB Release # 2006-007 (12/19/06)

Read more about SOX Optimization through the implementation of GRC Software
Created by NetReach®  Powered by cmScribe cmScribe logo
Clicky Web Analytics